DHS defied a federal court order to image 800 immigration agents' cellphones sought as evidence in LA racial-profiling suit
On August 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt of court and imposed $500-per-day fines for failing to comply with a January 2026 order requiring DHS to create digital images of the personal and government cellphones of more than 800 immigration agents involved in 2025's "Operation At Large" Los Angeles immigration crackdown. DHS admitted in June 2026 it was processing only three phones every two weeks, a pace that would take nearly four years to complete; plaintiffs in the underlying Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem suit say the records may show a pattern of racial profiling by agents who used slurs including "wet" and "tonks" to identify Latino people for stops.
Actors
On August 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt of court and ordered escalating fines of $500 per day until DHS complies with an order she issued in January 2026 requiring the agency to create digital images of the personal and government cellphones of more than 800 immigration agents involved in "Operation At Large," the Trump administration's 2025 Los Angeles immigration crackdown. Frimpong also ordered DHS to reimburse plaintiffs' attorneys for the cost of pursuing the records. In her written order, Frimpong found DHS "acted intentionally and not in good faith" and that "the fact that phone imaging would take substantial effort does not relieve Defendants from a court order."
DHS attorneys admitted in June 2026 court proceedings that the agency had not turned over the records and was processing government-issued devices at a rate of three phones every two weeks -- a pace plaintiffs noted would take nearly four years to finish; as of late June 2026, no personal phones had been forensically imaged at all. ACLU attorneys wrote in May 2026 that DHS had "simply proceeded to thwart" Frimpong's order "by dragging their feet on imaging government-issued cell phones and by openly defying the order as to personal phones." DHS's defenses shifted over the course of the discovery dispute, first arguing agents don't use texting professionally, then that personal phones fell outside the government's custody or control -- arguments the court rejected.
The phone records are sought as part of Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem, in which plaintiffs represented by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California argue the devices may contain evidence of a pattern of racial profiling by federal agents during the Los Angeles sweeps. Court filings in the same case have already surfaced text messages and bodycam footage showing agents using slurs including "wet" and "tonks" to identify Latino people for stops, evidence this archive separately recorded on July 27, 2026. "Not only are federal agents violating the Constitution on the streets, the government is violating court orders by intentionally withholding critical evidence about its immigration enforcement operations," said Mayra Joachin of the ACLU of Southern California. DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the contempt finding; it later issued a written statement identical to one it had released the prior week, saying its "agents are focused on protecting the American people -- not entertaining performative outrage."
Why we recorded this
Court orders bind the government the same as any other litigant, and discovery orders exist so that people alleging misconduct can obtain the evidence needed to prove it. DHS was ordered in January 2026 to image the cellphones of more than 800 immigration agents from the 2025 Los Angeles sweeps, evidence plaintiffs say could show a pattern of racial profiling, but instead processed devices at a rate that would take nearly four years to finish, drawing a contempt finding and daily fines in August 2026. This archive records when a government agency's own defiance of a court's order becomes an obstacle to accountability for the abuse the order was meant to help prove.
Sources
- Judge orders daily fines against Homeland Security in case over LA immigration sweeps — CalMatters investigative accessed August 5, 2026
- Judge holds Homeland Security in contempt in case over LA immigration sweeps — LAist investigative accessed August 5, 2026
- Federal Judge Holds DHS in Contempt Over Immigration Agents' Text Records — NOTUS investigative accessed August 6, 2026
- 'Noncompliance is intentional': Judge slaps Trump admin with daily sanctions after DHS violates discovery obligations — Law&Crime investigative accessed August 6, 2026
See also
- ICE kept detaining Nevada immigrants without bond hearings past a court-ordered release deadline, defying a judge's March ruling
- ICE removed an estimated 116 immigration detainees from South Florida in violation of federal habeas orders, judge found
- ICE arrested a Bronx asylum seeker at a Manhattan immigration court in continued defiance of a judge's order barring such arrests
- FEMA cut Aberdeen-Hoquiam flood grant from $47M to $34.65M and delayed it one year as DHS diverted FEMA resources to immigration enforcement
- ICE moves forward with Hagerstown warehouse-detention construction in defiance of Baltimore federal judge's injunction
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
