U.S. 5th Circuit ended 1965 Concordia Parish school desegregation order, backing DOJ campaign to lift decrees
On July 14, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting in New Orleans, upheld the lifting of a 1965 federal desegregation consent decree governing Louisiana's Concordia Parish schools. The ruling backed a Justice Department campaign, carried out with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill through "joint stipulated dismissals" that require no proof segregation has ended, to terminate Civil Rights-era school desegregation orders. The decree, in place for more than 60 years, ended without an evidentiary finding that segregation had been eradicated.
Actors
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Liz Murrill (Louisiana Attorney General)
On July 14, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting in New Orleans, ended more than 60 years of federal desegregation oversight of Louisiana's Concordia Parish School Board, upholding the dissolution of a consent decree that originated with a 1965 lawsuit. The order dated to an era when the Ferriday area was segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan; Black families had sued for access to all-white schools, and the federal government intervened.
The ruling handed a victory to the Trump administration, whose Justice Department reversed decades of federal practice and pushed to terminate Civil Rights-era desegregation orders, framing them as federal intrusion into local schools. In Louisiana the decrees have been dismantled with the cooperation of Attorney General Liz Murrill, who has used "joint stipulated dismissals" that do not require proof that segregation has been eradicated. Announcing the ruling, Murrill said the decision "puts that authority back where it belongs," with the elected school board rather than unelected federal judges.
Civil-rights groups and some parents have argued the orders remain necessary tools against lingering vestiges of segregation, including racial disparities in student discipline, academic programs, and teacher hiring. The Concordia Parish decree had been used as recently as 2013 to require a mostly white charter school to prioritize Black students and build a more integrated enrollment. The families who originally brought the suit are no longer involved in the case.
Why we recorded this
Civil-rights remedies exist so courts can enforce constitutional guarantees of equal protection until the harm they address is proven cured. A federal appeals court ended more than 60 years of court-ordered desegregation oversight of Concordia Parish schools without any finding that segregation had been eliminated, ratifying a Justice Department strategy of dissolving such decrees through stipulated dismissals that require no such proof. Removing an enforcement mechanism while the underlying remedy remains unmet weakens the structural safeguards that guard against a return to segregated schooling.
Sources
- Federal appeals court ends a decades-old school desegregation order in Louisiana — Associated Press primary accessed July 16, 2026
- Far-right appeals court hands Trump a win in his segregation-enabling crusade — MS NOW secondary accessed July 16, 2026
See also
- U.S. District Court dismissed DeSoto Parish's 1967 school desegregation order at DOJ, Louisiana AG's request, without a desegregation finding
- DOJ sues to halt Evanston reparations program, citing Equal Protection Clause
- DOJ sues to halt Evanston reparations program, calling it 'racially discriminatory' under Equal Protection Clause
- Education Dept. transfers Office for Civil Rights to DOJ and special education office to HHS
- DOJ intervened to halt Evanston's reparations program, calling the nation's first such program unconstitutional
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
