DOJ sues to halt Evanston reparations program, citing Equal Protection Clause

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a legal challenge to halt Evanston, Illinois's reparations program, the first such program in the United States, arguing it violates the Equal Protection Clause and constitutes racial discrimination. The program provides $25,000 housing grants to Black residents who meet eligibility criteria based on residency and documented exposure to housing discrimination, with more than $20 million allocated over 10 years.

The U.S. Department of Justice, led by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon, filed a legal challenge asking a federal judge to halt Evanston, Illinois's reparations program — the first such program in the United States. The DOJ called the program "racially discriminatory," asserting it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Evanston program, launched in 2021, targets eligible Black residents—defined as those meeting specific residency requirements and with documented exposure to housing discrimination or living in areas directly affected by the city's history of discriminatory housing policies. The program provides $25,000 housing grants per eligible recipient, with more than $20 million allocated over 10 years to compensate for the lingering effects of historical segregation and discriminatory lending practices that concentrated poverty and reduced wealth-building opportunities in Black neighborhoods.

The Evanston reparations program, funded through cannabis tax revenue and private donations, was the first in the country to provide direct payments to Black residents for documented discriminatory housing policies. The eligibility criteria ensure the grants target those most affected by systemic housing discrimination, not all Black residents of the city. The DOJ intervention represents the federal government actively working to dismantle a local civil rights remedy that was approved through a democratic city council process. Harmeet Dhillon's Civil Rights Division has reoriented since Trump's second term to challenge race-conscious programs rather than defend them. The DOJ's Equal Protection framing — arguing that a program for Black residents discriminates against non-Black residents — mirrors arguments brought by conservative legal groups. This signals a broader federal posture against race-based remediation programs at all levels of government.

This action represents federal intervention in a local civil rights remedy—a reparations program democratically approved and implemented by Evanston to address documented housing discrimination. The DOJ's characterization of race-conscious remediation as "discriminatory" signals a federal posture against such programs across all levels of government, narrowing the tools available to jurisdictions attempting to address systemic inequality.

  1. Federal government challenges the United States' first ever reparations program in courtAP News primary accessed June 18, 2026
  2. Trump administration seeks to halt first US reparations program for Black peopleThe Guardian secondary accessed June 18, 2026