DOJ intervened to halt Evanston's reparations program, calling the nation's first such program unconstitutional
On June 16, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, led by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, moved to intervene in a federal lawsuit seeking to halt Evanston, Illinois's reparations program — the first such program in the United States. The DOJ argued the program, which awards $25,000 housing grants to eligible Black residents to address documented historical housing discrimination, violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act. The intervention joined an existing suit filed in 2024 by non-Black descendants of Evanston residents excluded from the program.
Actors
On June 16, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division filed a motion to intervene in a pending federal lawsuit challenging Evanston, Illinois's Local Reparations Restorative Housing Program — the first municipal reparations program in the United States. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon announced the intervention, arguing the program "distributes millions of dollars in cash and housing benefits to people because of the color of their skin" and constitutes "race discrimination, pure and simple." The DOJ contended the program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Fair Housing Act.
The Evanston program was established in 2021 following a 2019 city council resolution acknowledging the city's documented role in racially discriminatory housing policies from 1919 to 1969. It uses cannabis tax revenue to provide $25,000 housing grants to eligible Black residents or their direct descendants, with more than $20 million allocated over ten years. The underlying lawsuit was filed in 2024 by non-Black descendants of Evanston residents from the same period, who argued their exclusion from the program was itself a constitutional violation; a federal court denied the city's motion to dismiss in March 2026. The DOJ's intervention aligned its enforcement posture with the original plaintiffs — treating a race-conscious civil rights remedy as a civil rights violation — mirroring the legal strategy advanced by the American Civil Rights Project and consistent with the Civil Rights Division's reorientation under Dhillon away from defending race-conscious programs toward challenging them.
Why we recorded this
Reparations programs are one of the few institutional mechanisms through which local governments can address documented, structural discrimination — and their constitutionality under the Equal Protection Clause has long been contested. The Evanston program was the first of its kind in the United States, approved through a democratic city council process and funded through local cannabis tax revenue. The DOJ's intervention, framing a race-conscious civil rights remedy as itself a form of racial discrimination, signals a broader federal posture against race-based remediation at all levels of government. We record this because it represents the federal executive branch using litigation power to dismantle a local civil rights institution.
Sources
- Federal government challenges the United States' first ever reparations program in court — AP News primary accessed June 29, 2026
- U.S. Justice Department Moves to Intervene in Race Discrimination Lawsuit Challenging Reparations Program in Evanston, Illinois — U.S. Department of Justice primary accessed June 29, 2026
- Trump administration seeks to halt first US reparations program for Black people — The Guardian secondary accessed June 29, 2026
- Evanston's reparations plan faces constitutional challenge — Evanston RoundTable secondary accessed June 29, 2026
See also
- DOJ sues to halt Evanston reparations program, citing Equal Protection Clause
- DOJ sues to halt Evanston reparations program, calling it 'racially discriminatory' under Equal Protection Clause
- Education Dept. transfers Office for Civil Rights to DOJ and special education office to HHS
- Mother Jones report reveals Trump DOJ building case for forced psychiatric institutionalization, undermining Olmstead
- Department of Education opened Title IX investigations into three Michigan school districts over trans-inclusive sports and locker room policies
