Virginia Supreme Court strikes down Democratic-led mid-decade congressional gerrymander
Virginia's Democratic-led General Assembly advanced a mid-decade redraw of the state's 11 U.S. House districts, first stripping congressional map-drawing power from the voter-established bipartisan redistricting commission through a constitutional amendment that voters narrowly ratified 52% to 48% on April 21, 2026. On May 8, 2026, the Supreme Court of Virginia struck the amendment down, ruling that the legislature had violated the state constitution's multi-step process for placing amendments on the ballot and rendering the referendum null and void. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to revive the plan on May 15, leaving Virginia's existing court-drawn map in place; the Democratic-drawn map, engineered to flip as many as four Republican-held seats, never took effect.
Actors
- Virginia General Assembly
- Don Scott (Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates)
- Jay Jones (Attorney General of Virginia)
Virginia's Democratic-led General Assembly pursued a mid-decade redraw of the state's 11 U.S. House districts during its 2025 and 2026 sessions. Because Virginia's congressional maps are constitutionally assigned to a voter-established bipartisan redistricting commission, the legislature first advanced a constitutional amendment to temporarily return map-drawing power to itself. Voters narrowly ratified that amendment, 52% to 48%, in an April 21, 2026 special election, clearing a legislature-drawn map engineered to flip as many as four Republican-held seats — a plan that, according to Associated Press reporting, included a district "stretching out like a lobster to consume Republican-leaning rural areas" and revisions across Richmond, southern Virginia, and Hampton Roads that would have diluted conservative voting blocs.
On May 8, 2026, the Supreme Court of Virginia struck the amendment down. The court held that the General Assembly had violated the state constitution's multi-step process for placing amendments on the ballot — which requires approval in two separate legislative sessions with an intervening election — as well as a 1902 statute requiring publication of the amendment 90 days before that election. The legislature's first vote had been taken in an October 2025 special session while early voting in that year's general election was already underway. The court ruled that the violation "irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void," and ordered the state to use its existing court-drawn congressional map. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to revive the plan on May 15, 2026, after Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones filed an emergency appeal. The gerrymander never took effect; Virginia's current map, with six Democratic-leaning and five Republican-leaning districts, remains in place.
This is recorded as an attempted partisan gerrymander regardless of its outcome or which party drew it. Virginia's effort was an explicit response to a wave of Republican mid-decade redraws in states including Texas, Florida, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Tennessee, several of them encouraged by President Donald Trump; that context explains the motive but does not change the classification. Under the publication's broken-windows principle, an abuse of power that is checked by the courts remains part of the record. The second mapped abuse, ignoring statutory requirements, rests on the affirmative judicial findings — by both a Tazewell County circuit judge in January 2026 and the Supreme Court of Virginia — that the legislature failed to follow the constitutional and statutory process for amending the constitution.
Why we recorded this
Districts should reflect how voters actually vote, not be drawn to predetermine winners — a principle that holds no matter which party stands to benefit. Gerrymandering is the drawing of lines to lock in outcomes beyond routine redistricting. We record this because Virginia's legislature pursued a mid-decade redraw engineered to flip as many as four seats, first changing the rules through an amendment the state's highest court found had been placed on the ballot in violation of the constitution's required process. An attempt to engineer the map belongs in the record whether or not a court later blocks it; the abuse is the effort to predetermine the outcome, and judicial review is the check on it.
Sources
- Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP — NPR primary accessed May 20, 2026
- Virginia Supreme Court strikes down Democrats' redistricting plan, dimming party's midterm hopes — Associated Press (via WDBJ7) primary accessed May 20, 2026
- U.S. Supreme Court denies Virginia redistricting appeal — WDBJ7 secondary accessed May 20, 2026
See also
- USDA said it would relocate Forest Service HQ and close 57 of 77 research facilities without required congressional approval
- ICE deported Colombian woman to DR Congo after Congolese officials refused her on medical grounds
- Acting ICE Director Lyons acknowledged agency missed 48-hour death-notice requirement in two-thirds of in-custody deaths since 2025
- GEO Group barred Washington state health inspectors from its Tacoma ICE detention center despite an upheld state oversight law
- Park Service extends White House AECOM contract to bypass bidding on Trump's Triumphal Arch
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
