Federal agents deployed tear gas and chemical munitions against protesters and journalists at Portland ICE facility

Over the weekend of January 31–February 1, 2026, federal agents deployed tear gas and chemical munitions against protesters and freelance journalists outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Portland, Oregon. The deployments were the subject of lawsuits by protesters, journalists, and nearby residents, represented in part by the ACLU of Oregon, who alleged the munitions were used in retaliation for First Amendment activity. On February 3, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order barring agents from using less-lethal munitions and chemical agents absent an imminent threat of physical harm.

Over the weekend of January 31 and into February 1, 2026, federal agents deployed tear gas and chemical munitions against crowds of protesters and freelance journalists gathered outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in South Portland, Oregon. The deployments were part of an ongoing pattern of force used against demonstrators at the facility, where nightly protests had drawn a sustained federal response. Protesters and journalists reported being gassed and struck with less-lethal projectiles while documenting or peacefully demonstrating against immigration enforcement.

The conduct was challenged in litigation brought by protesters and freelance journalists, represented in part by the ACLU of Oregon, who alleged that agents deployed chemical munitions in retaliation for constitutionally protected First Amendment activity; separate suits were filed by residents of a nearby low-income apartment complex into which the gas drifted. The suits sought to restrain federal agents from using tear gas, pepper balls, and other crowd-control munitions against people who posed no threat.

This entry records the underlying use of force against protesters and the press. Because state violence directed at protected assembly and at journalists documenting government conduct — rather than at a genuine, imminent threat — strikes at the accountability that is supposed to constrain how the government polices dissent, the deployments and the court proceedings they prompted belong in the record.

Updates

2026-02-03 — Federal judge restricted agents' use of tear gas and munitions [1, 2]

U.S. District Judge Michael Simon issued a temporary restraining order barring federal agents from deploying tear gas, chemical agents, and less-lethal munitions against crowds at the Portland ICE facility unless a specific person posed an imminent threat of physical harm.

2026-02-16 — Oregon Attorney General filed evidence and arguments supporting the lawsuit [7, 8]

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield's office submitted testimony and evidence to the district court supporting the ACLU of Oregon's lawsuit, urging a preliminary injunction against federal agents' use of tear gas, pepper balls, and other crowd-control munitions at the Portland ICE facility. The filing included witness declarations describing panic and confusion as tear gas spread through a "densely packed crowd" of protesters during the January 31 demonstration.

2026-03-09 — Judge continued and expanded the restrictions [3]

Judge Simon continued and broadened the order restricting agents' use of tear gas and chemical munitions on protesters at the facility.

2026-03-25 — Ninth Circuit paused the district-court orders [4]

A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel stayed the district-court orders, temporarily allowing federal agents to resume using crowd-control munitions while the government's appeal proceeded.

2026-07-10 — Trump administration urged the Ninth Circuit to lift the limits [5, 6]

The Trump administration urged a Ninth Circuit panel to leave federal agents free to deploy tear gas and chemical munitions at the facility, as the dispute over the district court's restrictions returned before the appeals court.

Government force against people gathered to protest must stay necessary and proportional, and the First Amendment protects both demonstrators and the journalists documenting them. Federal agents repeatedly fired tear gas and chemical munitions into crowds of protesters and freelance reporters outside the Portland immigration detention facility, conduct a federal judge found serious enough to restrain by court order. We record this because state force deployed against protected assembly and a free press, rather than against a genuine and imminent threat, erodes the accountability that is supposed to govern how the government uses violence on the people it polices.

  1. Federal judge restricts agents' use of tear gas, munitions against crowds at Portland ICE facilityOregon Capital Chronicle investigative accessed July 11, 2026
  2. Federal judge in Oregon restricts use of tear gas on ICE protestersNBC News secondary accessed July 11, 2026
  3. Federal judge continues to restrict agents' use of tear gas on protesters at Portland ICE facilityOregon Capital Chronicle investigative accessed July 11, 2026
  4. Appeals court pauses rulings that limit federal force outside Portland ICE buildingOregon Public Broadcasting investigative accessed July 11, 2026
  5. Feds urge Ninth Circuit for continued tear gas use at Portland ICE facilityCourthouse News Service investigative accessed July 11, 2026
  6. Tear gas use at Portland ICE facility once again goes before federal appeals courtOregon Public Broadcasting investigative accessed July 11, 2026
  7. Attorney General Dan Rayfield Submits Evidence and Arguments in Lawsuit Challenging Excessive Use of Force by Federal Agents at Portland ICE BuildingOregon Department of Justice primary accessed August 14, 2026
  8. Oregon attorney general backs lawsuit over use of force at Portland ICE protestKPTV investigative accessed August 14, 2026