Justice Department fired San Francisco immigration judge Chloe Dillon amid purge of high asylum-grant-rate judges

The U.S. Department of Justice fired San Francisco immigration judge Chloe Dillon by email on August 22, 2025, giving no reason, amid a wave of firings of high asylum-grant-rate judges that coincided with a DOJ memo on scrutinizing judges' case-outcome statistics. Dillon's supervising assistant chief immigration judge had warned her months earlier that "the White House" was watching after she resisted a directive to grant all ICE requests to transfer cases to a different venue. In a whistleblower complaint filed September 10, 2026, Dillon alleged the firing came two days after she separately reported that ICE agents had unlawfully detained an unaccompanied minor who had just appeared in her courtroom.

Part of: Trump Administration Attacks on Judicial Independence

On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice fired San Francisco immigration judge Chloe Dillon by email, informing her the termination was effective immediately and giving no reason. Dillon was in her chambers finishing a hearing when she found the message, titled "Notice of Termination," in her inbox; her supervisor arrived minutes later to have her sign paperwork acknowledging the firing and return government property.

Dillon's dismissal came amid a wave of firings that had already removed several San Francisco immigration judges in the preceding months, and it coincided with a Justice Department Executive Office for Immigration Review policy memo, released the same day, on "Adjudicator Independence and Impartiality" that raised the prospect of scrutinizing judges with "statistically improbable" case-outcome metrics. Dillon had granted asylum in roughly 96 percent of the cases before her, one of the highest rates in the San Francisco court.

In a whistleblower complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on September 10, 2026, Dillon gave a more specific account of retaliation she says she experienced. She alleged that months before her firing, after she resisted a directive requiring immigration judges to grant every ICE request to move a case to a different court venue — which she argued was unlawful and could undermine a noncitizen's right to counsel — her supervising assistant chief immigration judge told her "the White House" was watching the issue and cautioned her against resisting. She separately alleged that her firing came two days after she reported that ICE agents had unlawfully detained an unaccompanied minor who had just appeared in her courtroom. The White House and the Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment on either the 2025 firing or the 2026 complaint.

Updates

2026-09-12 — DOJ called Dillon's retaliation allegations "patently false" [5]

A Justice Department spokesperson told The Independent, "While we do not typically comment on pending litigation or personnel matters, we can tell you that this allegation is patently false," adding that the department was "restoring integrity" to the immigration system after the prior administration. The statement was the department's first on-the-record response to Dillon's September 10, 2026 whistleblower complaint.

Judicial independence depends on adjudicators being free to rule on the law and the record before them without fear of losing their job over the outcome. The Justice Department fired immigration judge Chloe Dillon by email, effective immediately, months after her supervisor, she alleges, warned her that "the White House" was watching her resistance to a directive she found unlawful, and amid a wave of firings that disproportionately hit judges with high asylum-grant rates. This archive records the firing because removing an adjudicator on the heels of an alleged warning tied explicitly to a specific ruling, inside a purge measured by case outcomes, substitutes political will for legal judgment.

  1. 'The White House was watching': Fired immigration judge alleges retaliation by DOJ — MS NOW primary accessed September 10, 2026
  2. 'Shell-shocked': SF Immigration Court reels from judge firings — The San Francisco Standard investigative accessed September 10, 2026
  3. Another San Francisco immigration judge fired by the Trump administration — NBC Bay Area primary accessed September 10, 2026
  4. Trump admin. fires S.F. immigration judge with high asylum rate — Mission Local investigative accessed September 10, 2026
  5. SF judge says she was fired 48 hours after questioning ICE treatment of asylum seeker — The Independent primary accessed September 12, 2026