South Carolina Legislature completed passage of HJR3133, a constitutional same-sex marriage ban, referring it to voters
The South Carolina House passed H.3133 (A45, R51) 96-3 on March 1, 2005, proposing a constitutional amendment limiting lawful domestic unions to one man and one woman; the Senate amended and passed it 2005-04-14, and the House concurred in the Senate amendment and enrolled the bill on 2005-04-26, completing the General Assembly's referral of the amendment to voters. The measure was ratified 2005-04-28 without need for the governor's signature, and voters approved the resulting Amendment 1 on November 7, 2006.
Actors
- South Carolina House of Representatives
- South Carolina Senate
On April 26, 2005, the South Carolina House of Representatives concurred with Senate amendments to H.3133 (A45, R51) and enrolled the bill (HJ-67), completing the General Assembly's bicameral referral of the constitutional amendment to the ballot. The House had initially passed H.3133 96-3 on March 1, 2005, with Rep. Greg Delleney as lead sponsor, proposing to add Section 15 to Article XVII of the state constitution barring the state and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing any domestic union other than a marriage between one man and one woman, including unions created by other jurisdictions.
The Senate amended and passed the measure on April 14, 2005, and returned it to the House with amendments. The joint resolution was formally ratified on April 28, 2005; as a constitutional amendment referral it was not subject to the governor's veto and required no signature.
This entry records the legislature's 2005 act of referring the marriage-restriction amendment to the ballot, distinct from the General Assembly's later 2007 act (H.3063) formally ratifying the amendment's incorporation into the constitution following voter approval.
Updates
2006-11-07 — South Carolina voters approved Amendment 1 banning same-sex marriage [2]
Voters approved the measure as Amendment 1 to the South Carolina Constitution on November 7, 2006, by a margin of 77.97% to 22.03%.
2015-06-26 — Obergefell v. Hodges superseded Amendment 1 [4]
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), that state bans on same-sex marriage violate the U.S. Constitution, superseding South Carolina's Amendment 1.
Why we recorded this
The South Carolina General Assembly completed legislative passage of a constitutional amendment declaring marriage between one man and one woman the only lawful domestic union the state would recognize, using the legislature's referral power to place a targeted restriction on same-sex couples' rights before the electorate. Entrenching a discriminatory marriage classification into the state constitution is a legislative act singling out a class of people for exclusion from equal recognition under the law.
Sources
- H.3133 (A45, R51) bill history and ratified text — South Carolina General Assembly primary accessed July 20, 2026
- South Carolina Amendment 1, the Marriage Act (2006) — Ballotpedia secondary accessed July 20, 2026
- 2006 South Carolina Amendment 1 — Wikipedia secondary accessed July 20, 2026
- Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) — Justia U.S. Supreme Court primary accessed July 20, 2026
See also
- Texas Legislature gave final passage to HJR 6, referring same-sex marriage and civil union constitutional ban to voters
- Kansas Legislature referred SCR1601, a constitutional same-sex marriage ban, to voters
- South Dakota Legislature passed HJR1001, referring constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage to voters
- Virginia General Assembly gave first passage to HJ586, a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and equivalent legal recognition
- Virginia General Assembly completed first passage of SJ337, constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage recognition
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
