Virginia General Assembly gave first passage to HJ586, a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and equivalent legal recognition
On February 26, 2005, both chambers of the Virginia General Assembly adopted the conference committee report on HJ586, a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to restrict marriage to one man and one woman and bar recognition of any comparable legal status. The House agreed to the conference report 79-17 and the Senate agreed 30-10, completing the first of two required legislative passages under Virginia's amendment process. The resolution was enacted as Chapter 946 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly, setting the stage for a second passage in the next session and a statewide referendum.
Actors
- Virginia House of Delegates
- Virginia Senate
On February 26, 2005, the Virginia General Assembly completed the first passage of HJ586, a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would define marriage as solely between one man and one woman and prohibit the Commonwealth or any political subdivision from recognizing any comparable legal status for same-sex couples. The House of Delegates agreed to the conference committee report by a vote of 79-17, and the Senate agreed by a vote of 30-10 on the same day. The proposed amendment stated that "only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions," and further barred any legal status for unmarried individuals that would approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage, or any other union, partnership, or legal status assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage. HJ586 incorporated House Joint Resolutions 584 and 615, and its proposed text was identical to companion Senate Joint Resolution 337 as passed. The resolution was enrolled and signed by the Speaker and Senate President, then assigned as Chapter 946 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly. Under Virginia's constitutional amendment process, this first passage required a second passage by a subsequently elected legislature before the amendment could be submitted to voters for ratification.
Updates
2006-02-25 — Virginia General Assembly completed second passage of HJ586/SJ337 as Marshall-Newman Amendment [1]
In the 2006 regular session, the Virginia General Assembly completed the second of two required legislative passages of the constitutional amendment (passed identically in HJ586 and SJ337), clearing it for a statewide ballot as the Marshall-Newman Amendment.
2006-11-07 — Virginia voters ratified the Marshall-Newman Amendment by approximately 57 percent [2]
Virginia voters approved the Marshall-Newman Amendment at the November 2006 general election by approximately 57 percent, writing the same-sex marriage and civil union ban into the state constitution.
2014-02-13 — Federal district court struck down Virginia's Marshall-Newman Amendment as unconstitutional [4]
U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen ruled in Bostic v. Rainey, 970 F. Supp. 2d 456 (E.D. Va. 2014), that Virginia's constitutional and statutory bans on same-sex marriage violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. She found that marriage is a fundamental right subject to strict scrutiny and that Virginia's arguments failed to meet that standard. The ruling was stayed pending appeal.
2014-07-28 — Fourth Circuit affirmed, striking down Virginia's same-sex marriage ban [4]
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled 2–1 in Bostic v. Schaefer, No. 14-1167, that Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage impermissibly infringed on the fundamental right to marry, affirming the district court. Judge Henry Floyd wrote the majority opinion. The Supreme Court stayed enforcement on August 20, 2014, and denied certiorari on October 6, 2014, at which point the Fourth Circuit ruling took effect.
2015-06-26 — Obergefell v. Hodges rendered Virginia's Marshall-Newman Amendment unenforceable [3]
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), that the Constitution requires states to license and recognize same-sex marriages, superseding the Marshall-Newman Amendment.
Why we recorded this
Virginia's legislature codified anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination by approving the first passage of a proposed constitutional amendment (HJ586) that would restrict marriage to opposite-sex couples and bar recognition of any equivalent legal status. This first passage, clearing the House 79-17 and the Senate 30-10 on the conference report, set in motion a process requiring a second legislative passage before the question went to voters. When Virginia voters ultimately approved the Marshall-Newman Amendment in 2006, it embedded this exclusion directly in the state constitution, denying same-sex couples equal dignity and access to legal protections until the Supreme Court's Obergefell ruling in 2015.
Sources
- LIS > Bill Tracking > HJ586 (2005 Session) — Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems primary accessed July 20, 2026
- Same-sex marriage in Virginia — Wikipedia secondary accessed July 20, 2026
- Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) — Justia U.S. Supreme Court primary accessed July 20, 2026
- Bostic v. Schaefer — Wikipedia secondary accessed July 24, 2026
See also
- Virginia General Assembly completed first passage of SJ337, constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage recognition
- Kansas Legislature referred SCR1601, a constitutional same-sex marriage ban, to voters
- South Dakota Legislature passed HJR1001, referring constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage to voters
- Alabama Legislature passed SB109, referring same-sex marriage constitutional ban to voters
- Tennessee Legislature gave final passage to SJR0031, proposing constitutional ban on same-sex marriage
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
