Bloomberg investigation revealed DOJ subpoenaed X for an anonymous ICE critic's identity, address, and banking data

On May 28, 2026, Bloomberg reported that the U.S. Department of Justice, under U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, had issued a federal grand jury subpoena to X seeking the name, address, and banking information of an anonymous user, represented by attorney Joshua Koltun, over a sarcastic post referencing the ICE officer who shot Minneapolis protester Renee Good. The subpoena followed DOJ's withdrawal of an earlier administrative summons for the same information after Koltun challenged it, and neither DOJ nor the user have been told what crime is under investigation. The user has moved to quash the subpoena in federal court, in a case pending before Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg.

Bloomberg reported on May 28, 2026, that the U.S. Department of Justice, under U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, issued a federal grand jury subpoena to X seeking the name, address, and banking information of an anonymous user who posted sarcastically about donating to the ICE officer who fatally shot Minneapolis protester Renee Good, including an address the user's attorney says was already public elsewhere. The user, represented by attorney Joshua Koltun, learned of the demand from X. DOJ had first sought the same information via an administrative summons, which requires no judicial involvement; after Koltun challenged it, DOJ withdrew the summons and instead obtained the grand jury subpoena, a criminal-investigation tool far harder to quash. Neither DOJ nor the user has been told what offense is under investigation; Koltun said the post "does not contain a trace or an inkling" of intended violence.

The X subpoena came roughly two months after DOJ used the identical escalation -- administrative summons withdrawn, then secret grand jury subpoena -- against Reddit, to identify a different anonymous ICE critic represented by Civil Liberties Defense Center attorney Lauren Regan. Both followed a broader Department of Homeland Security campaign, reported in February 2026, of hundreds of administrative subpoenas to Google, Reddit, Discord, and Meta seeking ICE critics' identities.

Both users have moved to quash their grand jury subpoenas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, before Chief Judge James Boasberg. Regan called the pattern of abandoning summonses for grand jury subpoenas once challenged "further proof" of "a bad faith attempt to unmask the user" rather than a genuine investigation. Reddit said it reviews government data requests and objects to overbroad ones; an X spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. The First Amendment Coalition said the effort threatens protected anonymous political speech.

The First Amendment protects the right to criticize government agents anonymously, without becoming the target of the government's own investigative machinery. Here, after the Department of Justice's initial administrative summons for an anonymous X user's data was withdrawn following a legal challenge, prosecutors escalated to a grand jury subpoena -- a criminal-investigation tool -- seeking the user's name, address, and banking information, without disclosing what crime is under investigation. This archive records when a government agency turns the tools of a criminal investigation on a citizen's protected criticism rather than reserving them for actual wrongdoing.

  1. DOJ Wants to Know Who on Reddit, X Criticizes ICE's TacticsBloomberg Law primary accessed August 13, 2026
  2. The DOJ is reportedly asking Reddit and X for the identities of anti-ICE postersEngadget secondary accessed August 13, 2026
  3. DOJ subpoenas Reddit in effort to unmask Trump criticsRaw Story secondary accessed August 13, 2026
  4. Trump's DOJ Demands Reddit and X Hand Over Names, Addresses and Banking Details of Online ICE CriticsIBTimes UK secondary accessed August 13, 2026