Secret Service, Trump White House barred JD Vance critic from Bangor event over her online criticism, lawsuit alleges

On May 14, 2026, armed U.S. Secret Service agents and other officials organizing Vice President JD Vance's public event in Bangor, Maine, identified Amanda McGonigle — creator of the @CatsOnACouch social media accounts that mock Vance — by name in the registration line and denied her entry despite her having registered and received official guest confirmation from the Executive Office of the President. McGonigle sued Secret Service Director Sean Curran, Office of Presidential Advance Director John Hiller, the Executive Office of the President, and the Secret Service, alleging First Amendment retaliation and viewpoint discrimination.

On May 14, 2026, Vice President JD Vance held a publicly advertised government event at Bangor International Airport in Bangor, Maine, publicizing the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud that he chairs. Amanda McGonigle — creator of the @CatsOnACouch social media accounts, which mock Vance and have more than 2.1 million Instagram followers — had registered for the event through an Executive Office of the President link and received official confirmation and guest guidance carrying the seal of the Office of the Vice President. While she stood in the registration line, five officials, including two armed U.S. Secret Service agents, approached her, addressed her by name, and denied her entry, telling her "we know where you stand," according to her sworn declaration; nearby attendees wearing clothing supportive of the administration were allowed inside, she said.

McGonigle had also been denied confirmation to attend an earlier Vance event in Des Moines, Iowa, on May 5, 2026, after event organizers sent attendance confirmation to other registrants but not to her. On July 7, 2026, the ACLU of Maine and the national ACLU sued on her behalf in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, naming Secret Service Director Sean M. Curran and Office of Presidential Advance Director John Hiller in their official capacities, along with the Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Secret Service, and alleging First Amendment retaliation and viewpoint discrimination. The complaint states that Hiller's Office of Presidential Advance coordinates audience registration and attendance at vice-presidential events nationwide, and that the Secret Service, under Curran, implements that office's practices regarding who is admitted.

The Secret Service has disputed that its access decisions turn on attendees' political views, saying its role is limited to security and that it does not screen attendees based on political opinions or protected speech. As of McGonigle's mid-August court filing, the government had not investigated her account of the Bangor exclusion or otherwise responded to her allegations in court.

Updates

2026-08-24 — Government admitted McGonigle to Brewer event, mooting injunction request [5, 6, 7]

Ahead of another Vance event in Brewer, Maine, McGonigle sought a preliminary injunction guaranteeing her admission. The government told the court she would be allowed to attend and treated like any other registered member of the public; a federal judge denied the injunction as an unnecessary "advisory opinion" given that assurance, and McGonigle attended the Brewer event without interference. Her underlying First Amendment lawsuit over the Bangor exclusion remains pending.

Access to a taxpayer-funded, publicly advertised government event is not supposed to depend on what an attendee has posted online. This archive records the exclusion because, according to her lawsuit, officials organizing and securing Vice President Vance's Bangor appearance singled out a registered attendee by name and turned her away, telling her "we know where you stand," while admitting nearby attendees wearing pro-administration clothing. Conditioning access to an official government function on a critic's political views, rather than on any rule applied evenly to the whole audience, is exclusion from government participation on the basis of speech — the mechanism this archive tracks as blacklisting.

  1. McGonigle v. Curran — Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory ReliefACLU of Maine / ACLU primary accessed August 26, 2026
  2. @CatsOnACouch Instagram Creator Barred from JD Vance Event Sues, Alleges Violation of First Amendment RightsACLU primary accessed August 26, 2026
  3. Influencer suing Trump administration after she was barred from JD Vance's event in BangorBangor Daily News investigative accessed August 26, 2026
  4. Amanda McGonigle, @catsonacouch creator, sues after being barred from JD Vance eventNBC Washington investigative accessed August 26, 2026
  5. 'Cats On A Couch' Instagram influencer will be allowed into JD Vance's Brewer eventBangor Daily News investigative accessed August 26, 2026
  6. Shortly After Filing, Government Upholds CatsOnACouch Creator's Right to Attend Vance Event TodayACLU primary accessed August 26, 2026
  7. Social media influencer critical of JD Vance allowed to attend Brewer eventNHPR (NPR Maine) secondary accessed August 26, 2026