DOJ directs the Federal Bureau of Prisons to expand federal execution protocol to include the firing squad
On April 24, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced — in a same-day press release from the Office of Public Affairs paired with the Office of Legal Policy report "Restoring and Strengthening the Federal Death Penalty" — that it had directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to expand the federal execution protocol to include the firing squad alongside other methods, and to reinstate the pentobarbital lethal-injection protocol used during the first Trump administration. The DOJ also directed BOP to consider relocating or expanding federal death row or constructing an additional execution facility to accommodate the added methods. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the action; the underlying report's preparation had been directed by former Attorney General Pamela Bondi.
Actors
On April 24, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced — through a same-day press release from the Office of Public Affairs paired with the Office of Legal Policy report Restoring and Strengthening the Federal Death Penalty — that it had directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to take three administrative actions on the federal death penalty. First, BOP was directed to reinstate the pentobarbital lethal-injection protocol used during the first Trump administration. Second, BOP was directed to expand the federal execution protocol to include the firing squad and other manners of execution beyond lethal injection. Third, BOP was directed to consider relocating or expanding the existing federal death-row facility, or constructing an additional execution facility, to accommodate the added methods. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the actions; the underlying report's preparation had been directed by former Attorney General Pamela Bondi.
The DOJ report grounds the firing-squad expansion in Wilkerson v. Utah (1878), the Supreme Court's nineteenth-century decision holding that execution by shooting did not violate the Eighth Amendment. The Death Penalty Information Center's contemporaneous analysis notes that Wilkerson was decided under the long-superseded framers'-intent framework — not the "evolving standards of decency" framework that has governed every Eighth Amendment method-of-execution case decided by the Supreme Court since Trop v. Dulles (1958). The Court has never evaluated the constitutionality of the firing squad under the modern framework. The DPIC also notes that only five states currently authorize the firing squad, and that since 1977 fewer than one percent of U.S. executions have been carried out by that method.
This entry is recorded under corrections-abuse. The
discrete event is the April 24, 2026 administrative directive to
BOP — an action taken, not a proposal — that adds a method of
execution to the federal protocol and authorizes facility planning
to implement it. Two parallel acts surfaced in the same DOJ release
on the same day are recorded as separate entries: the announcement
of a forthcoming notice of proposed rulemaking to narrow federal
habeas review of state capital convictions
(issue-143-federal-ignoring-habeas, the trimmed sibling that retains
the habeas focus matching its slug) and the announcement of a
forthcoming rule barring federal capital inmates from filing clemency
petitions until direct appeals and first collateral attack are final
(issue-258-federal-narrowing-civil-rights-protections). The shift
between announcement and final-rule promulgation will be archived as
separate events when the rules are filed and finalized.
Why we recorded this
The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbids cruel and unusual punishment, and for nearly seventy years the Supreme Court has measured methods of execution against society's evolving standards of decency rather than nineteenth-century practice. When the federal government expands its execution protocol to add the firing squad and revive an earlier lethal-injection method, it changes how the state may put the people in its custody to death. We record this because how a government treats those it imprisons and executes is a measure of its restraint, and adding execution methods by administrative directive is the kind of action a public archive should preserve.
Sources
- The Justice Department Takes Actions to Strengthen the Federal Death Penalty — U.S. Department of Justice — Office of Public Affairs primary accessed May 28, 2026
- Restoring and Strengthening the Federal Death Penalty (DOJ report) — U.S. Department of Justice — Office of Legal Policy primary accessed May 28, 2026
- Department of Justice Releases Memo Calling for Expansion of Federal Death Penalty and New Methods — Death Penalty Information Center investigative accessed May 28, 2026
- Trump's Justice Department is bringing back firing squads for federal executions — CNN secondary accessed May 28, 2026
See also
- DOJ agrees to pay Trump ally Michael Flynn $1.25M to settle malicious-prosecution suit
- Deputy AG Blanche boasts every DOJ and FBI employee who investigated Trump is gone
- DOJ sued Washtenaw County, Michigan to strike down ICE non-cooperation policies, invoking the Supremacy Clause
- DOJ fired 4 prosecutors who handled FACE Act cases against anti-abortion activists, citing 'weaponization'
- DOJ removes career federal prosecutor leading the Brennan investigation after she resisted bringing charges career staff judged unsupported
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
