DOJ declined France's judicial-assistance request in the criminal probe of Musk's X, citing the First Amendment
On April 17, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of International Affairs sent French authorities a two-page letter declining their request for assistance in France's criminal investigation of Elon Musk's X, accusing French prosecutors of misusing their legal system to interfere with an American business. The letter framed the French probe — opened in 2025 over X's content-selection algorithm and expanded after a February 2026 raid of X's Paris office — as an effort to regulate a public square for free expression contrary to the First Amendment. The refusal, reported by The Wall Street Journal on April 18 and endorsed publicly by Musk, was one of three French assistance requests the Department rebuffed.
Actors
On Friday, April 17, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of International Affairs sent French authorities a two-page letter formally declining their request for legal assistance in France's criminal investigation of Elon Musk's social media platform X. The letter, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, accused French prosecutors of misusing their legal system to interfere with an American business and described France's requests as "an effort to entangle the United States in a politically charged criminal proceeding aimed at wrongfully regulating through prosecution the business activities of a social media platform." It stated that the French probe "seeks to use the criminal legal system in France to regulate a public square for the free expression of ideas and opinions in a manner contrary to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution."
France's investigation opened in 2025 after complaints from a lawmaker and another official alleging that X's content-selection algorithm amounted to foreign interference; it later widened to include suspected data offenses and content-moderation failures, and in February 2026 Paris prosecutors raided X's French office and summoned Musk for questioning. The Office of International Affairs is the DOJ component that processes mutual-legal- assistance requests between the United States and foreign governments, a function ordinarily handled as neutral law-enforcement cooperation. An xAI official thanked the Department for "rejecting this effort by a prosecutor in Paris to compel our CEO and several employees to sit for interviews." After The Wall Street Journal reported the letter on April 18, Musk — the owner of X and a prominent administration ally — shared the article on X and commented, "Indeed, this needs to stop."
Updates
2026-04-18 — Paris prosecutors said they had no knowledge of the DOJ letter [1]
The Paris prosecutor's office told Reuters it had no knowledge of the DOJ letter cited by the Journal and stressed that "the French constitution guarantees the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary," adding that the investigation would continue regardless of whether X executives cooperated.
2026-05-07 — France escalated to a formal criminal investigation of Musk and Yaccarino [5, 6]
Paris prosecutors escalated the matter to a formal criminal investigation, placing Musk and former X CEO Linda Yaccarino under investigation in their capacities as platform managers over alleged complicity in distributing child sexual abuse imagery and sexual deepfakes, disinformation, and manipulation of automated data-processing systems as part of an organized group.
Why we recorded this
The Justice Department's authority to grant or deny cross-border legal assistance is meant to serve the rule of law and U.S. treaty commitments, not the private interests of a politically favored business owner. Here the DOJ refused France's judicial-assistance request in an active criminal investigation of Elon Musk's X and publicly accused a democratic ally's judiciary of misusing its own legal system, casting a foreign criminal probe as an attack on free expression. Using the Department's international-affairs machinery to shield an administration ally from foreign criminal scrutiny turns a neutral law-enforcement function into an instrument of political favor — the pattern this archive records as weaponizing the Justice Department.
Sources
- US Justice Department refuses to assist French probe into Musk's X, WSJ reports — Reuters primary accessed July 16, 2026
- Justice Department refuses to assist French probe into Musk's X, WSJ reports — CNBC secondary accessed July 16, 2026
- DOJ declines to assist France in probe of Elon Musk's X — The Hill secondary accessed July 16, 2026
- DOJ Dismisses French Request To Assist With Probe Of Elon Musk's X — Benzinga secondary accessed July 16, 2026
- French prosecutors escalate probe of Elon Musk and X to criminal investigation — CNBC investigative accessed July 16, 2026
- Elon Musk faces criminal probe in France as prosecutors escalate X's AI investigation — Euronews investigative accessed July 16, 2026
See also
- DOJ agrees to pay Trump ally Michael Flynn $1.25M to settle malicious-prosecution suit
- Deputy AG Blanche boasts every DOJ and FBI employee who investigated Trump is gone
- DOJ fires six immigration judges, including two who blocked deportations of Öztürk and Mahdawi
- DOJ fired 4 prosecutors who handled FACE Act cases against anti-abortion activists, citing 'weaponization'
- DOJ removes career federal prosecutor leading the Brennan investigation after she resisted bringing charges career staff judged unsupported
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
