Justice Alito declined to recuse from Supreme Court's Suncor climate case cert grant despite fossil-fuel holdings and past recusals
On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, agreeing to review whether federal law bars local governments from suing fossil-fuel companies over climate damages; Justice Samuel Alito participated in that decision rather than recusing. Alito holds up to $15,000 in ConocoPhillips stock and $15,000–$50,000 in Phillips 66 stock — both companies are defendants in parallel climate suits the Boulder case would help decide — plus a fund whose third-largest holding is ExxonMobil, a named party, and he had recused from an earlier petition in the same Boulder litigation and from a related 2025 petition on the same issue. A Supreme Court spokeswoman told NBC News in May 2026 that Alito's holdings do not include Suncor or ExxonMobil directly and that his earlier recusal had been inadvertent.
Actors
- Samuel Alito (Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States)
On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County (No. 25-170), agreeing to review the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling that let Boulder's public-nuisance suit against Suncor and ExxonMobil over climate damages proceed in state court; the Court's order also directed the parties to brief whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case at all. Justice Samuel Alito participated in the decision to grant review, and the docket carries no notation that he recused.
Alito holds up to $15,000 in ConocoPhillips stock and between $15,000 and $50,000 in Phillips 66 stock — both companies are defendants in parallel state climate suits whose outcome the Boulder ruling would help decide — plus an ETF whose third-largest holding is ExxonMobil, a named party in the case. He had recused himself from an earlier Boulder petition in 2023 and from a related 2025 petition raising the same preemption question in Honolulu's climate suit. He did not recuse from the February 2026 grant and has not publicly explained the change.
Updates
2026-05-12 — Watchdog coalition asked Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate Alito [5, 6]
A coalition led by True North Research and the Revolving Door Project, joined by the Center for Biological Diversity, League of Conservation Voters, and Alliance for Justice, wrote to the top members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, arguing Alito's participation in the Suncor case was undermining public confidence in the Court's impartiality and asking the committee to investigate whether his conduct violated the Court's ethics code.
2026-05 — SCOTUS said Alito recusal in 2023 was inadvertent, not required now [4]
A Supreme Court spokeswoman told NBC News that Alito was not required to recuse because his most recent financial disclosure showed no direct stock ownership in Suncor or ExxonMobil and that the Court's legal counsel had advised him accordingly. She said his 2023 recusal from the earlier Boulder petition had been "inadvertent," a byproduct of that petition being considered alongside other cases in which he did hold a direct financial interest, not a deliberate step-back from the Boulder litigation itself.
2026-08-11 — Court Accountability found Alito gained up to $2.9M from oil and gas [8, 9]
The judicial watchdog group Court Accountability published an analysis of Alito's 2005–2024 financial disclosures finding he gained between $390,000 and $2.9 million from oil and gas interests, most of it from a Grady County, Oklahoma mineral interest held by his wife and leased in 2022 to Citizen Energy, later acquired by Validus Energy — majority-held by Elliott Investment Management, which holds more than 52 million Suncor shares and whose founder, Paul Singer, paid for an undisclosed 2008 private jet flight Alito took.
2026-08 — Court scheduled oral argument for Oct 5, 2026, new term opening day [8, 9]
The Supreme Court set oral argument in the case for October 5, 2026, the opening day of its new term; the Trump administration, siding with the oil companies, requested 10 minutes of argument time.
Why we recorded this
Judges are required to step aside from cases touching their own financial interests so the public can trust that rulings turn on law, not personal gain. Justice Samuel Alito holds investments in ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, and an ExxonMobil-linked fund, and had recused himself from an earlier petition in this same Boulder climate-liability litigation and from a related 2025 petition on the same legal question — yet participated in the Court's decision to hear the fossil-fuel companies' appeal here, without public explanation. This archive records when an official's own prior conduct establishes that a conflict exists, and the official proceeds anyway.
Sources
- Docket for 25-170, Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County — Supreme Court of the United States primary accessed August 14, 2026
- Supreme Court Will Hear Exxon's Effort to Crush Climate Lawsuits — DeSmog investigative accessed August 14, 2026
- Climate Litigation Updates (March 23, 2026) — Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School investigative accessed August 14, 2026
- Justice Alito pushes back on calls to sit out a major Supreme Court climate case — NBC News primary accessed August 14, 2026
- Watchdogs seek Senate probe of Alito over oil case conflicts — E&E News (POLITICO) investigative accessed August 14, 2026
- Coalition Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Leadership — True North Research / Revolving Door Project (coalition letter) primary accessed August 14, 2026
- Supreme Court Denies Big Oil Request to Review Climate Lawsuit — Center for Climate Integrity secondary accessed August 14, 2026
- Analysis: Samuel Alito has made up to $2.9 million from fossil fuel assets while serving on the Supreme Court — The Guardian / Mother Jones (Climate Desk collaboration) investigative accessed August 14, 2026
- Alito Made Millions on Fossil Fuels But Won't Recuse From Exxon Case — The New Republic secondary accessed August 14, 2026
See also
- FCC Chair Carr and Commissioner Trusty accepted Kennedy Center gala seats amid pending Paramount merger review
- Deputy Defense Secretary Feinberg amended his ethics agreement to keep receiving Cerberus services indefinitely
- EPA methane chief secretly authored oil industry's case against the rules he now rewrites
- Interior official Karen Budd-Falen worked on federal grazing rules benefiting her family's ranches despite a signed recusal
- Trump misses STOCK Act 45-day deadline; OGE fines him twice for late stock-trade disclosures
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
