CBS News report revealed DOJ immigration court locked out independent observers at Minneapolis's Whipple building
CBS News Minnesota reported on January 14, 2026 that immigration court officials at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis had locked courtroom doors, denied or severely restricted independent observers' access, and stripped names and complete case numbers from case records — a pattern the advocacy group The Advocates for Human Rights said has continued since early 2025. DOJ's own published policy states immigration courts are open to the public except when a judge grants a motion to close a hearing or limit attendance; no such motion or other government justification for the restrictions was reported.
Actors
CBS News Minnesota reported on January 14, 2026 that court observers from The Advocates for Human Rights have been denied or severely restricted from accessing immigration courtrooms at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis: courtroom doors locked, observers turned away entirely at times, lobby access restricted even when courtroom access was granted, and names and complete case numbers stripped from case records, hampering the organization's ability to track cases. Advocacy director Madeline Lohman said the effect has been "to hide what they are doing to make it difficult to document." The organization has operated its Immigration Court Observation Project at the same courthouse, then known as Fort Snelling, since 2017, previously with the court's cooperation.
The restrictions began in early 2025 and intensified through the year, according to the organization's own later account: courtroom doors were locked during routine scheduled hearings, entire dockets were closed without case-specific justification, public access to virtual Webex hearings was eliminated, observers were required to wear identification lanyards not mandated by federal regulation, and observers were expelled from the lobby and hallways with seating removed. Advocates documented individuals denied the ability to argue their own cases and being handcuffed immediately after courtroom exits, previously visible from the lobby before lobby access was also restricted.
DOJ's own published fact sheet states immigration courts are open to the public with limited exceptions, such as when a judge grants a motion to close a hearing or limit attendance; no such motion or other government justification for the ongoing restrictions was reported. CBS News Minnesota sought comment from the immigration court system; none was provided.
Updates
2026-03-12 — The Advocates for Human Rights sued DOJ over the access restrictions [3]
The Advocates for Human Rights filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice alleging the courtroom-access and docket-closure practices at Fort Snelling violated the First Amendment, the Administrative Procedure Act, and DOJ's own regulations governing public access to immigration court hearings. The organization's own account of the underlying restrictions detailed locking courtroom doors during routine scheduled hearings, blanket docket closures without case-specific justification, elimination of public access to virtual hearings, mandatory identification lanyards not required by federal regulation, and expulsion of observers from the lobby and hallways.
Why we recorded this
Public access to immigration court proceedings lets citizens verify the government follows its own rules; DOJ's own published policy states these courts are open to the public except when a judge grants a specific closure motion. At the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, immigration court officials locked courtroom doors, turned away independent observers, restricted lobby access, and stripped names and case numbers from case records, without citing any judicial closure order, hampering an accountability organization's ability to document and track proceedings since early 2025. This archive records a sustained pattern of obstructing public observation of government proceedings with no stated legal justification.
Sources
- Court observers continue to be locked out of Minneapolis immigration courtrooms — CBS News Minnesota primary accessed August 31, 2026
- Immigration Court Observation Project — The Advocates for Human Rights primary accessed August 31, 2026
- The Advocates for Human Rights Files Federal Lawsuit to Protect Public Access to Immigration Court Hearings — The Advocates for Human Rights primary accessed August 31, 2026
See also
- Federal prosecutors misreported ICE detainee's Maine location to court, nearly stripping habeas jurisdiction
- Washington Post investigation found DOJ hired immigration judges for ideological alignment, two-thirds lacking immigration-law experience
- BIA fast-tracked Mahmoud Khalil's deportation case in 9-day 'unprecedented' turnaround
- EOIR held first 'mega master' immigration hearing in San Diego, ordered 50 deported in absentia
- Texas Tribune reveals Trump administration asked Texas criminal-defense commission to take over immigrant children's deportation cases
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
