IRS disclosed 47,000 taxpayers' addresses to ICE under an April 2025 data-sharing deal, later found unlawful in 42,695 cases
On August 7, 2025, the IRS disclosed the last-known addresses of approximately 47,000 taxpayers to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, responding to a June 27, 2025 ICE request for 1.28 million records under an April 2025 data-sharing agreement signed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Of the addresses disclosed, 90.3% were matched and released through an automated process that never independently verified the addresses ICE had supplied, as Section 6103 requires. A federal judge later found the IRS had violated the statute approximately 42,695 times.
Actors
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
- Scott Bessent (Secretary of the Treasury)
- Kristi Noem (Secretary of Homeland Security)
On August 7, 2025, the Internal Revenue Service disclosed the last-known addresses of approximately 47,000 taxpayers to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, responding to a June 27, 2025 ICE request covering 1.28 million taxpayer records. The disclosure came under an April 7, 2025 memorandum of understanding between the IRS and the Department of Homeland Security, signed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, allowing ICE to submit names and addresses of people it suspects are in the country illegally for cross-verification against IRS tax records. IRS Code 6103, one of the strictest confidentiality statutes in federal law, permits such disclosures only when ICE's request specifies the correct "address of the taxpayer" and the IRS confirms the request meets the statute's requirements before releasing the information. The agreement was controversial from the outset: the IRS's then-acting commissioner, Melanie Krause, resigned the day after it was signed rather than implement it.
Of the roughly 47,000 addresses disclosed on August 7, only 4,594 (9.7%) were properly matched by address. The remaining 42,695 (90.3%) were released through an automated Taxpayer Identification Number-matching process that never independently verified the addresses ICE had supplied, despite Section 6103's requirement that the IRS confirm the request specified the correct address before disclosing it. That gap between what the law required and what the IRS's automated process actually checked is what a federal court later found unlawful.
Updates
2025-11-21 — Federal judge preliminarily enjoined further IRS-ICE data transfers [7]
U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly granted a preliminary injunction barring the IRS from further sharing taxpayer address information with ICE, finding the August 7 disclosures likely violated Section 6103(i)(2) and the Administrative Procedure Act. The order stayed the April 2025 agreement pending further proceedings.
2026-02-11 — IRS admitted in a court declaration that 42,695 of the disclosures were unlawful [8, 9]
IRS Chief Risk and Control Officer Dottie Romo filed a declaration acknowledging that of the 47,289 taxpayer records the IRS matched and disclosed to ICE, 42,695 (90.3%) were released through the automated process without independently verifying the addresses ICE had supplied, and that the IRS "provided confidential taxpayer information even when DHS officials could not provide sufficient data to positively identify a specific individual." The filing gave the first specific accounting of the scale of the August 7 disclosure's deficiencies.
2026-02-26 — District court issued indicative ruling confirming the finding [2, 3]
Judge Kollar-Kotelly issued an order on whether to supplement the appellate record with the Romo declaration while the case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit, writing that the IRS's admission "confirms the Court's [prior] finding" that the IRS had violated Section 6103 "approximately 42,695 times." The order was procedural -- addressing what the appellate record should contain -- rather than a new factual finding, but it was the first public confirmation of the 42,695 figure tied to the court's own language, which is how this development was initially reported.
2026-09-08 — D.C. Circuit affirmed the injunction, calling the government's argument "weak sauce" [10, 11, 12, 13]
A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel affirmed Judge Kollar-Kotelly's preliminary injunction, ruling that the IRS's justification for the August 2025 disclosures was legally deficient and rejecting the government's objection to the injunction's prior-notice requirement as "weak sauce." The panel wrote that "the IRS is now on notice twice over regarding the inadequacies of its summer 2025 disclosures" and that the government and its personnel "face steep civil and criminal consequences for willful disclosure of information in violation of section 6103."
Why we recorded this
IRS Code 6103 is one of the strictest confidentiality statutes in federal law, restricting taxpayer data to narrow, statutorily defined purposes -- it does not authorize using tax records as an immigration-enforcement tool. In August 2025, the IRS disclosed tens of thousands of taxpayers' last-known addresses to ICE under an April 2025 data-sharing agreement, relying on an automated matching process that never verified whether ICE's requests met the statute's requirements. A federal court later found 42,695 of those disclosures unlawful. This archive records the disclosure because it documents an agency repurposing legally protected personal data for a purpose Congress never authorized, at a scale a court has since confirmed.
Sources
- Center for Taxpayer Rights v. Internal Revenue Service, Memorandum Opinion — U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (via Justia) primary accessed August 10, 2026
- The IRS broke the law by disclosing confidential information to ICE 42,695 times, judge says — Newsday (Associated Press) investigative accessed August 9, 2026
- IRS broke the law more than 40K times by sharing addresses with ICE, judge says — FedScoop investigative accessed August 9, 2026
- Center for Taxpayer Rights v. Internal Revenue Service, docket — CourtListener (D.D.C. docket 1:25-cv-00457) primary accessed August 9, 2026
- The IRS finalizes a deal to share tax information with immigration authorities — NPR primary accessed August 10, 2026
- IRS acting commissioner resigning over Treasury's plan to share immigrant tax data with ICE — CBS News investigative accessed August 10, 2026
- Federal Judge's Injunction Halts IRS's Taxpayer Data-Sharing With DHS and ICE — FindLaw secondary accessed August 10, 2026
- IRS Admits It Illegally Shared Taxpayer Data with ICE, Bringing New Urgency in Ongoing Case to Protect Americans' Sensitive Information — Democracy Forward primary accessed August 10, 2026
- IRS erroneously shared confidential immigrant taxpayer data, DHS court filing shows — Fox News investigative accessed August 10, 2026
- DC Circuit rules IRS data sharing plan with ICE unlawful — Courthouse News Service investigative accessed September 9, 2026
- DC Circ. Affirms Injunction Against IRS-ICE Data Sharing — Law360 investigative accessed September 9, 2026
- Judge Rules Trump's Defense of IRS-ICE Agreement Is "Weak Sauce" — The New Republic investigative accessed September 9, 2026
- Appeals court upholds ruling barring IRS from sharing data with ICE — The Hill secondary accessed September 9, 2026
See also
- ICE task force officers logged Spokane protesters' license plates and personal data into an evidence database
- Trump signed EO 14248 requiring documentary proof of citizenship on the federal voter registration form
- ICE awarded GEO Group and 12 other firms up to $1.2 billion to locate immigrants, supplying contractors 50,000 names a month
- TSA Acting Administrator McNeill falsely told Congress TSA does not send passenger data to ICE; FOIA-obtained agreement showed it does
- ATF analyst used Richmond police license-plate-reader access for immigration enforcement, violating department policy
Receive the daily digest by email
One email each morning with every entry filed the day before. Free. No tracking, no ads. Unsubscribe anytime.
