DOJ filed motion to terminate Flores Settlement Agreement, eliminating court-ordered protections for immigrant children in custody

On May 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion in federal court to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement, a 1997 court settlement that has set minimum care standards and a 20-day detention cap for immigrant children in federal custody for nearly three decades. Attorney General Pam Bondi's DOJ argued termination was warranted by post-settlement regulations and a 2022 Supreme Court ruling. Judge Dolly Gee denied the motion in August 2025, finding the government remained in substantial noncompliance with the settlement's terms.

On May 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement, a 1997 court settlement establishing minimum standards of care for immigrant children in federal immigration custody. The motion, filed by Attorney General Pam Bondi's Justice Department, sought to eliminate protections that have been in force for nearly three decades, including requirements for adequate food, water, sanitation, and medical care, and a 20-day cap on the detention of children. DOJ argued termination was warranted because post-settlement regulations had incorporated the settlement's goals and because the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Garland v. Aleman-Gonzalez supported the government's position.

The Flores Settlement originated from a 1985 class action lawsuit — Jenny L. Flores v. Meese — on behalf of unaccompanied immigrant children detained by federal immigration authorities. Supervised by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee of the Central District of California, it remains the primary binding constraint on how the federal government may detain children in immigration custody. The first Trump administration made identical termination arguments in 2019 and again in a regulatory proceeding; Judge Gee rejected those attempts in December 2020, finding the proposed regulations fell far short of the settlement's protections and that the government had not demonstrated substantial compliance.

Judge Gee denied the May 2025 motion in August 2025 on the same grounds, finding again that the government had not demonstrated substantial compliance with the settlement's terms and that no changed circumstances justified termination. The government subsequently appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The motion was filed as part of a broader second-term effort to reduce judicial oversight of immigration detention, consistent with simultaneous administration moves to expand expedited removal authority, terminate Temporary Protected Status for multiple nationalities, and eliminate due process protections for noncitizens in removal proceedings.

The Flores Settlement Agreement has set minimum standards for the humane treatment of children in federal immigration custody since 1996, including requirements for food, water, sanitation, and a 20-day cap on detention. By filing to terminate it, the Justice Department sought to eliminate the only binding legal framework protecting the most vulnerable people in the immigration system — unaccompanied and family-unit children — from indefinite detention in substandard conditions. Unilateral executive moves to shed court oversight of detention practices corrode the rule of law and strip marginalized communities of procedural protections that courts have repeatedly held are constitutionally required.

  1. Trump administration seeks to end protections for immigrant children in federal custodyAP News primary accessed June 26, 2026
  2. Trump administration seeks to end court settlement protecting migrant childrenCBS News secondary accessed June 26, 2026
  3. Trump Administration Moves to End Settlement that Protects Immigrant ChildrenChildren's Rights secondary accessed June 26, 2026