Oklahoma Gov. Stitt signed SB 1100, barring nonbinary sex designations on birth certificates

On April 26, 2022, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed Senate Bill 1100, amending the state's vital-records statutes to require that the biological sex designation on a birth certificate be either male or female and expressly prohibiting a nonbinary designation or any symbol representing one, including "X." The bill carried an emergency clause and took effect immediately, reversing a nonbinary-marker option the Oklahoma State Department of Health had begun permitting the prior year under a lawsuit settlement.

On April 26, 2022, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed Senate Bill 1100, which amends the state's vital-records statutes (63 O.S. Sections 1-311, 1-313, 1-316, and 1-321) to require that the biological sex designation on a certificate of birth be either "male" or "female" and expressly prohibits a nonbinary designation or any symbol representing one, including the letter "X." The bill carried an emergency clause and took effect immediately upon the governor's signature.

Oklahoma's Department of Health had begun permitting nonbinary birth-certificate markers the prior year after settling a lawsuit brought by an Oklahoma-born resident who had been denied one; the settlement prompted outrage among Republicans, including Stitt, whose appointee to lead the agency resigned the following day before Stitt issued an executive order reversing the policy. SB 1100 wrote that reversal into statute, and outlets covering the signing described Oklahoma as the first state to explicitly bar nonbinary designations on government-issued birth certificates.

Updates

2024-06-18 — 10th Circuit reversed dismissal of birth-certificate lawsuit [4]

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit unanimously reversed a lower court's dismissal of Fowler v. Stitt, the lawsuit challenging Oklahoma's categorical ban on correcting sex markers on birth certificates (the same ban SB 1100 wrote into statute), holding the policy lacked a rational basis and that a majority of the panel found discrimination against transgender people warrants heightened scrutiny; the case was remanded for further proceedings, not finally resolved.

2025-06-30 — Supreme Court granted cert and remanded case to 10th Circuit [5]

The U.S. Supreme Court granted Oklahoma's petition for certiorari in Fowler v. Stitt and remanded the case to the Tenth Circuit for reconsideration in light of United States v. Skrmetti (upholding Tennessee's restrictions on gender-transition care for minors), without ruling on the merits of Oklahoma's birth-certificate policy.

Government identity records should reflect who a person is, not foreclose it by law. Oklahoma enacted a statute requiring every birth certificate to designate a person's sex as strictly male or female and barring any nonbinary or "X" designation, reversing a policy the state had begun allowing under a settlement the year before. Writing a protected characteristic's exclusion into a mandatory identity document denies transgender and nonbinary Oklahomans an official record consistent with who they are, singling out a marginalized community for exclusion from an otherwise neutral government function.

  1. Oklahoma bans nonbinary gender identities on birth certificatesNPR primary accessed July 18, 2026
  2. Oklahoma governor signs law banning nonbinary birth certificatesCNN Politics secondary accessed July 18, 2026
  3. SB 1100 Bill InformationOklahoma State Legislature primary accessed July 18, 2026
  4. Fowler v. Stitt, No. 23-5080 (10th Cir. 2024)Justia / U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary accessed July 18, 2026
  5. Drummond touts Supreme Court wins on birth certificates and Title XOklahoma Office of the Attorney General primary accessed July 18, 2026