Arizona Legislature referred SCR1042, a constitutional same-sex marriage ban, to voters

On June 27, 2008, the Arizona Senate concurred in House amendments and gave final passage to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1042, referring a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution (Article XXX) providing that "only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state." The Senate had adopted the measure March 26, 2008 and the House passed it May 12, 2008; it was filed with the Secretary of State June 30, 2008 and went to voters as Proposition 102 that November.

On June 27, 2008, the Arizona Senate concurred in House amendments and gave final passage to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1042, referring to voters a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution adding Article XXX, which provides that "only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state." The Senate had unanimously adopted the resolution March 26, 2008, and the House passed it May 12, 2008; the enrolled measure was filed with the Secretary of State June 30, 2008, as Chapter 99 of the Laws of 2008.

The referral came two years after Arizona voters rejected a broader 2006 measure, Proposition 107, which would also have barred civil unions and domestic-partnership benefits and lost 51.4%-48.6% — making Arizona the first state to defeat a state constitutional same-sex marriage ban at the ballot. SCR1042's narrower, marriage-only text was designed to avoid the backlash that sank the 2006 effort. Voters approved the resulting measure as Proposition 102 on November 4, 2008, by a margin of 56.2%-43.8%, amending marriage recognition out of reach of the legislature and the courts alike.

Updates

2014-10-17 — Federal judge struck down Arizona's same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional [4]

U.S. District Judge John W. Sedwick ruled Article XXX unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment in Majors v. Jeanes, citing binding Ninth Circuit precedent; Arizona's attorney general declined to appeal and directed all county clerks to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately.

2015-06-26 — Obergefell v. Hodges nationally superseded Article XXX [5]

The U.S. Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to license and recognize same-sex marriages, rendering Article XXX unenforceable nationwide; the provision remains unrepealed in the text of the Arizona Constitution.

Equal protection under the law requires that a state's constitution not be used to permanently foreclose legal recognition of a group of its residents' relationships. Here, the Arizona Legislature gave final passage to a proposed constitutional amendment that would define marriage as only between one man and one woman, entrenching that restriction beyond the reach of ordinary legislation and putting it before voters. This archive records when a legislature refers a constitutional amendment that would deny a class of people legal recognition of their relationships.

  1. Chapter 0099 - 48th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (SCR1042)Arizona State Legislature primary accessed July 20, 2026
  2. Arizona Proposition 102, Definition of Marriage Amendment (2008)Ballotpedia secondary accessed July 20, 2026
  3. 2008 Arizona Proposition 102Wikipedia secondary accessed July 20, 2026
  4. Citing Previous Rulings, Federal Judge Throws Out Arizona Gay-Marriage BanNPR primary accessed July 20, 2026
  5. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015)Oyez primary accessed July 20, 2026