SCOTUS 6-3 overturned Humphrey's Executor, holding presidents may fire independent agency commissioners at will

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court overturned Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935) in a 6-3 ruling authored by Chief Justice Roberts in Trump v. Slaughter, holding that President Trump's firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter without cause was constitutional. The ruling makes Congress's statutory for-cause removal protections for independent agency commissioners — including at the FTC, NLRB, EEOC, MSPB, and CPSC — unenforceable. A separate 5-4 ruling in Trump v. Cook temporarily blocked Trump from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, carving out a partial exception for the Fed.

On June 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935) in a 6-3 ruling authored by Chief Justice Roberts in Trump v. Slaughter, holding that the president may fire members of independent multi-member agencies — including the FTC, NLRB, EEOC, MSPB, and CPSC — without cause and without congressional constraint. The case arose from Trump's March 2025 firing of FTC Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, both Democrats whose terms had not expired. Congress had designed those agencies with bipartisan balance requirements and for-cause removal protections; the majority held those statutory protections are constitutionally unenforceable.

The ruling expands on the Supreme Court's 2020 decision in Seila Law v. CFPB, which had stripped removal protections from single-director agencies. Roberts wrote for a six-justice majority — joined by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett — holding that Humphrey's Executor "cannot be squared" with the president's constitutional duty to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Justice Sotomayor, joined by Kagan and Jackson, dissented: "Today's decision is grievously wrong. ... The Court has handed the President a tool to transform expert independent agencies into instruments of his will."

Trump had already fired commissioners at the NLRB, EEOC, MSPB, and CPSC without cause prior to the ruling, in anticipation that the courts would validate the approach. The ruling eliminates any remaining legal basis for reinstatement of those commissioners. In a companion ruling in Trump v. Cook, the Court issued a separate 5-4 decision temporarily blocking Trump from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook — carving out a partial exception for the Fed on the grounds that its monetary-policy independence is more deeply embedded in statute and prior precedent — while returning the matter to lower courts for further review.

The Supreme Court's ruling dismantles the 90-year constitutional framework under which Congress could establish independent agencies whose members serve defined terms and cannot be removed at presidential whim. Humphrey's Executor had been foundational to congressional design of the FTC, NLRB, EEOC, MSPB, and CPSC — agencies created to operate free from partisan political pressure. The ruling makes it impossible for Congress to protect agency commissioners from politicized removal, concentrating enforcement of consumer protection, labor, civil rights, and merit-system law under direct presidential control.

  1. Supreme Court cements Trump's power over agencies long considered independentNPR primary accessed June 29, 2026
  2. Court allows Trump to fire FTC commissioner and overturns major restraint on presidential powerSCOTUSblog secondary accessed June 29, 2026
  3. Outcry over supreme court decision to grant Trump power to fire agency chiefsThe Guardian secondary accessed June 29, 2026
  4. Supreme Court ruling allows Trump to fire members of independent federal agenciesCBS News secondary accessed June 29, 2026