Trump publicly demands removal of EDVA U.S. attorney Siebert, who refused to indict Letitia James; Siebert resigns
President Trump publicly stated on September 19, 2025 that he wanted Erik Siebert, the top federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of Virginia, removed from his post; Siebert confirmed his resignation the same day. Siebert had reportedly informed senior Justice Department officials that he found insufficient evidence to charge New York Attorney General Letitia James — a Democrat who had successfully prosecuted Trump for civil fraud — with mortgage fraud. His top deputy, First Assistant Maya Song, also departed, and James was subsequently indicted on October 9, 2025, after new leadership took over.
Actors
- Donald Trump (President)
- Pam Bondi (Attorney General)
- Ed Martin (DOJ Weaponization Working Group)
On September 19, 2025, President Trump told reporters he wanted Erik Siebert, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, removed from his post. Siebert confirmed his resignation to colleagues the same day. According to NPR and other outlets, Siebert had informed senior Justice Department officials that he found insufficient evidence to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on mortgage fraud allegations — allegations originating from Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte, a Trump appointee. James had successfully sued Trump for civil fraud in New York. Siebert's top deputy, First Assistant Maya Song, also left. Following their departures, new EDVA leadership oversaw a grand jury that indicted James on October 9, 2025.
The pressure campaign against Siebert was not improvisational. The DOJ's Weaponization Working Group, whose coordinator Ed Martin had reportedly shown up at James' home in connection with the investigation, applied sustained pressure to the EDVA over months. Independent legal experts and James' attorneys described the probe as politically retaliatory from the outset: the FHFA's referral was itself politically timed, and the Biden-era DOJ had reviewed similar allegations and declined to proceed. Siebert's departure was the lever that cleared the path.
Trump's public demand and Siebert's same-day resignation illustrate the mechanism by which executive pressure can override an independent U.S. attorney: the threat of removal is sufficient to produce compliance or compel departure. This entry records the September 19 forced resignation — the originating abuse — distinct from the October 9 indictment of James (a separate, related event) and from the October 16 indictment of former National Security Adviser John Bolton, the third named Trump adversary charged within a month of this event.
Why we recorded this
Federal prosecutors are obligated by law and institutional tradition to make charging decisions based on evidence, not the president's political preferences. Siebert reportedly told senior DOJ officials he found insufficient evidence to indict James — who had successfully prosecuted Trump for civil fraud — yet he was removed the same day Trump publicly demanded it. After his departure, James was indicted. This archive records when a president forces out a U.S. attorney for refusing to pursue a politically-motivated case, making clear that prosecutorial independence can be overridden by executive pressure.
Sources
- U.S. attorney resigns under pressure from Trump to charge N.Y. AG Letitia James — NPR primary accessed June 22, 2026
- US attorney resigns amid pressure from Trump after sources say he refused to charge NY AG Letitia James — ABC News secondary accessed June 22, 2026
See also
- Trump directed DOJ to investigate federal grantees for lobbying and partisan activity, targeting advocacy organizations
- Trump signs NSPM-7 directing DOJ and FBI to investigate political beliefs as domestic terrorism indicators
- DOJ indicts former national security adviser Bolton on 18 classified-document counts; third Trump adversary charged in a month
- Reuters investigation reveals Trump administration operating secret 'Weaponization Working Group' targeting political critics
- FBI probes Democratic lawmakers for First Amendment-protected video on military constitutional duties
