Rubio issued APA determination exempting all immigration and border regulations from notice-and-comment rulemaking

On March 14, 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio published a determination in the Federal Register declaring that all federal efforts to control the entry and exit of people and goods at U.S. borders constitute a "foreign affairs function" under the Administrative Procedure Act. The determination invoked a narrow APA exception — historically limited to diplomatic agreements — to categorically exempt all immigration and border-control rulemaking by any federal agency from notice-and-comment requirements. The action eliminated the public's statutory right to review and challenge a broad category of federal regulations before they took effect.

On March 14, 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio published a formal determination in the Federal Register declaring that all federal efforts to control the status, entry, and exit of people, and the transfer of goods, services, data, technology, and other items across U.S. borders constitute a "foreign affairs function of the United States" under the Administrative Procedure Act — a classification that, by statute, exempts the covered activities from the APA's notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements.

The APA's notice-and-comment process is a core congressional mechanism: before a binding federal regulation takes effect, agencies must publish proposed rules, accept public comments, and respond to substantive objections. The foreign affairs exception was historically interpreted narrowly, confined to diplomatic agreements and international negotiations where advance public disclosure would compromise U.S. bargaining positions. Courts and legal scholars long held it inapplicable to domestic immigration enforcement programs, visa processing, and cross-border trade regulation.

Rubio's determination extended the exception to cover all such activity — every regulation issued by DHS, DOL, the State Department, and other agencies touching border control and immigration — regardless of how domestic in character the rulemaking might be. Economic Policy Institute analysts and Bloomberg Law reporters noted that the action would significantly limit judicial review of immigration regulations and foreclose the principal procedural avenue that advocacy groups had used to challenge rapid regulatory changes. Rubio cited Trump's "America First Policy Directive" (EO 14150) as authority for the declaration. Legal scholars characterized the reinterpretation as without precedent and inconsistent with the APA's text and legislative history.

The Administrative Procedure Act's notice-and-comment process is a congressional statute giving the public the right to review and contest federal regulations before they take effect. Rubio's determination invoked a narrow APA exception — intended for diplomatic agreements — to categorically strip that right from all immigration and border regulation by every federal agency. This archive records when executive officials use textual reinterpretation to override statutory protections Congress established, bypassing the lawmaking process without amending the statute.

  1. Determination: Foreign Affairs Functions of the United StatesFederal Register primary accessed June 28, 2026
  2. Rubio issues broad declaration on foreign affairs exception of the APAEconomic Policy Institute secondary accessed June 28, 2026
  3. Rubio Declares Immigration Regulations Exempt From Public NoticeBloomberg Law secondary accessed June 28, 2026